Let's Jam this Bog with Roasts

[Izak MD]

Originally Posted by Bobby Swisha

right, because Germanic tribes never raped anyone

muslims commit rape at a far higher number than native germans and europeans in general. it is basically well-established. the finnish government used to take stats on it. then they realized that the stats are racist, so they stopped. also, see the Rotherham scandal over from england.

i mean, this really is a "rape culture" if such a thing could ever exist

[Izak MD]

but anyhow that's not my point. my point is about the authorities, who dont really care that much about the crimes as much as the notion that people are upset with merkel being a complete retard

which basically confirms my theory that the mass media is pure evil

a good find from steve sailer, from the BBC

Ralf Jaeger, interior minister for North Rhine-Westphalia, said police had to “adjust” to the fact that groups of men had attacked women en masse. …

Mr Jaeger also warned that anti-immigrant groups were trying to use the attacks to stir up hatred against refugees.

“What happens on the right-wing platforms and in chat rooms is at least as awful as the acts of those assaulting the women,” he said.

[Andres]

It's not by any means exclusive to the left, but it's always really jarring to see that attitude of 'ugh, this thing that happened that contradicts my worldview is just gonna give ammo to my opponents!'

[Phil Williamson]

Originally Posted by Izak MD

muslims commit rape at a far higher number than native germans and europeans in general. it is basically well-established. the finnish government used to take stats on it. then they realized that the stats are racist, so they stopped. also, see the Rotherham scandal over from england.

i mean, this really is a "rape culture" if such a thing could ever exist

Yup, sad but true. Countless articles about how enriched German culture is by döner kebabs and currywurst while no one even reports on this for five days out of fears of "people taking it the wrong way," and we all scratch our heads and wonder why people are getting disillusioned and distrustful of the establishment in Europe and turning to the far right. We love talking about how "we need to have an honest conversation on such-and-such issue," but the expectation is usually for that honesty to be one-sided.

Originally Posted by Izak MD

a good find from steve sailer, from the BBC

it's ok man you don't have to start citing him all the time just cuz I called you out

[Izak MD]

Originally Posted by Phil Williamson

it's ok man you don't have to start citing him all the time just cuz I called you out

if you were to find out that i crib a lot from nick land too, i'd have to start mentioning that weirdo as well

oh wait fuck

[Izak MD]

Originally Posted by Andres

It's not by any means exclusive to the left,

very true

assuming everything is a false flag conspiracy is always a fun right-wing pastime

alex jones has been disappointing me though, he doesnt do it as much as he used to

[Bobby Swisha]

Originally Posted by Izak MD

muslims commit rape at a far higher number than native germans and europeans in general. it is basically well-established. the finnish government used to take stats on it. then they realized that the stats are racist, so they stopped. also, see the Rotherham scandal over from england.

i mean, this really is a "rape culture" if such a thing could ever exist

I know, I was kidding bro.

[Izak MD]

sry sry

as a token of my apologies, here is a video of libertarian superhero, stefan molyneux, talking about the birds and the bees

[Happyjuice]

-

[Andres]

Most of the things you said are things that people say about every major capital and/or center of commerce in the western world. Pretty much all major cities have more people (often of many different cultures), a bad housing market, are expensive in general, are grimier, there is more crime, and people are said to be colder and less friendly. That is simply how big cities tend to be.

The advantages are: food (and I find it very hard to believe that food culture in NYC is bad, considering the massive amount of ethnic communities and the restaurants that cater to foodies), culture, a sense of dynamism, cities that are more physically connected (more walkable, more public spaces, bigger neighborhoods with a stronger identity), much more job market flexibility / versatility, and a bunch of others that I can't think of.

You don't have to like it, but it seems excessive to call NYC a shithole when what you're basically saying is "I don't like big city living".

[Air Rick]

As someone who lives in nyc and has lived in boston and sydney I can tell you that a lot of the things on your list apply to all of them, juice.

It's city living.

[Bown]

London too

[Tuna Hematoma]

https://ca.movies.yahoo.com/post/136...-6-is-netflixs
Great news everyone!

[Dungeon Snake]

Originally Posted by Air Rick

As someone who lives in nyc and has lived in boston and sydney I can tell you that a lot of the things on your list apply to all of them, juice.

It's city living.

i dunno nyc always seemed astronomically expensive to me, even compared to other cities

[Happyjuice]

-

[Izak MD]

Originally Posted by Happyjuice

I dunno, it's just too much to deal with. I can't imagine living a stress free life there. Different strokes for different folks though, that lifestyle is appealing to some ppl

i could actually see myself thriving there, but miserably. stressful environments motivate the shit out of me, but they also fill me with a slightly unhinged, off-the-chain sort of manic edge.

[Happyjuice]

-

[Izak MD]

yeah......... that's basically the plan.

[Happyjuice]

-

[Izak MD]

oh wow! san antonio it is!!!!!!!!!

haha

nah i dunno, NOLA is cool. theres a certain appeal to living in such an unstable disaster area.

the one time i went to san antonio, it was to see a lucha libre wrestling event. it was in the middle of some corn field. you could tell that it was financed by some drug cartel. definitely a fun time. hijo del santo was wrestling. me and my friends were some of the only whites in the crowd. at one point, a wrestler with a satanic pentagram got on the mic and was being a rudo, and the crowd started booing. but it was all in spanish, so we couldn't understand what he was saying. then he kept talking and the crowd started to slowly clap and start cheering for the guy. my friend was like "oh.... it's because he has rejected satan! and he has become a catholic! don't do it! don't do it! don't sell out!!!" then the guy kept talking for a while, and then he changed his tone and was like "AAAHHH RUDO RUDO RUDO!" and the crowd started booing and jeering. and my friend was like "yes! it was all a trick! he has embraced satan after all!" then i asked a guy a couple rows down "hey, what was that guy talking about?" and he was like "ahhh, the local soccer team." it was all in all a great day.

[Dungeon Snake]

Originally Posted by Happyjuice

Houston is another option, not as balls to the wall as NYC but it still has that port smell, it's humid as shit, ridiculous diverse, lots of urban sprawl, and despite being slow paced (mayne hold up) it definitely lives up to the nickname "Hustle Town"


I'd say there's more money to be made in Houston. But I'm guessing homes are a lot cheaper in Norleans. The thing about NO is a lot of the jobs there rely on tourism, which isn't exactly the most stable economy.


Or you could move to San Antonio and work at Denny's within walking distance of your $550 a month apartment

man i used to live in amarillo... i spent like 760$/month on a live-in hotel with laundry service & cable. it was dank, had a kitchen and everything. free wifi and breakfast. walking distance to like 3 gyms and a Hastings entertainment. Extended Stay Hotel on 40, great people

[Happyjuice]

-

[Happyjuice]

-

[Rabid Dinosaur]

going to take this opportunity to interject that Montreal is dope and not incredibly expensive to live in

[Andres]

Originally Posted by Happyjuice

Why would you consider NYC a better place to live than any of those other cities I listed? What is more appealing about NYC than Philadelphia?

for all the reasons i already mentioned.

the capitals and centers of commerce of a country always have way more activity than the smaller cities. they are also more chaotic. or, to put it another way, a capital has more of the bad and more of the good.

if you like the good, then maybe you can put up with more bad things in order to get more good things. if you don't care for the good, maybe you don't really want to put up with the bad.

if you like, say, theater, you can watch way more theater in new york than in philadelphia. if you like art, you can see much more art in new york than in philadelphia. if you like concerts, you can go to more concerts in new york than philadelphia.

smaller cities are safer and more comfortable to live in, but part of being comfortable is that there's less to do, there's less new things, there's less change. there's nothing wrong with that, but sometimes people don't want that.

whereas in bigger cities, part of the dynamism comes from the fact that so many people are coming into these cities, and then eventually leaving too because they want a calmer lifestyle.