Let's Jam this Bog with Roasts - Page 1052

Old Rivers · 06-30-2012, 11:39 PM

god dammit, eukos

Nixon · 06-30-2012, 11:40 PM

edit pic link didnt work

Eukos · 06-30-2012, 11:41 PM

it does?

Old Rivers · 06-30-2012, 11:42 PM

i think he's talking about his own post

Dominator Dan · 07-01-2012, 12:23 AM

bill nickson never talks about himself, he is the most selfless person you'd ever meet, truly an inspiration to us all in the everlasting journey to better ourselves

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 01:22 AM

tired and i want to sleep hmmm i'm snoozing already

Phil Williamson · 07-01-2012, 06:53 AM

haha why would you release a 3dmm movie in 1080p

Jt Copper · 07-01-2012, 07:15 AM

Phil, Its ghost in the shell, by Red "Fucking" Wampa. It deserves to be 1080p.

Evil Ash · 07-01-2012, 07:23 AM

It can't even be 1080p. You're just upscaling from something stupid like 540x310. You're just making it big and blurry.

Phil Williamson · 07-01-2012, 07:40 AM

yeah. any resolution increase above 3dmm's native resolution can't possibly do anything.

Slime · 07-01-2012, 07:52 AM

well ive found that on youtube, uploading my footage (which is 1680x1050) at a higher resolution (1920x1200) enables 1080p which ends up looking better than 720p

what i mean is that the video will look better in 720p than it will in 480p wont it? the thing is you are trying to counter youtube's compression and the original video codec compression, which introduce artifacts if you were to just match 3dmm's resolution... its not the same as boosting the res on your monitor to try to make 3dmm look better or something

also i dont think 1440x1080 enables 1080p, does it? i thought that just enables 720p

the best thing about 1920x1200 is that it enables the Original option, which gets rid of all crappy youtube compression:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ffDJMJkAoI

even 1080p has visible annoyances to me (especially in dark areas, they lack detail) compared to Original
edit: wait... can everyone see the Original option, or just me? cause ive never seen anyone else's video with an Original option

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Ash

It can't even be 1080p. You're just upscaling from something stupid like 540x310. You're just making it big and blurry.

I might be upscaling it but with my settings nothing gets blurred or stretched.
the main reason I do this is mainly for testing purposes and against the shitty YT compression (Vimeo is in many better for 3dmm movies usually) since i'm investigating in doing a sort of hack for 3dmm which is increasing the resolution of the renderer

@lohr it does enable 1080p

Slime · 07-01-2012, 08:10 AM

upscaling is always worth it to fight compression.

I WANT SOME OF WHATEVER ASH AND PHIL ARE SMOKING!!

also could you check my vid and tell me if you see an "original" quality option please

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 08:13 AM

another thing is that if I put the effort into recording an hour long movie I want everything to be as good as possible. there were a few things in the Ghost In The Shell 3dmm I fixed up such as spelling errors etc. (for example "WIRTTEN BY" in the opening sequence)
We live in the year 2012, and when working with making it "1080p" I make sure that the quality is the best as it can get for a 3dmm movie

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lohr

also could you check my vid and tell me if you see an "original" quality option please

yep it's there

Slime · 07-01-2012, 08:23 AM

cool
thats kinda strange though since 1920x1200 isnt that high of a resolution, but i never see videos with the Original quality

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 08:26 AM

probably because everyone thinks that 1080p is the maximum you can get on youtube, so they don't bother rendering something in a higher resolution

Slime · 07-01-2012, 08:29 AM

maybe it can go even BEYOND ORIGINAL

haha that vid even has 3D because of the resolution

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 08:33 AM

the 3D option totally messes up my videos LOL, the colours and all

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 08:37 AM

also what I forgot to mention is that this whole "watch 3dmm movies in 1080p" is sort of a "marketing" thing. I'm probably the first one to actually do this and if people see movies on YouTube being called "HD 1080p" and all, they get noticed more likely. even here there are probably lots of people who haven't seen the ghost in the shell 3dm and posting a YouTube mirror of a movie is always appreciated anyway

James McCloud · 07-01-2012, 10:27 AM

as 3dmm.com image coordinator i'm going to have to ask you to stop your 'marketing'

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 11:51 AM

hahaha okay

Bown · 07-01-2012, 01:08 PM

that wouldn't really work at all

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 01:26 PM

Eukos · 07-01-2012, 01:30 PM

I don't get what's so wrong about this, I do a mirror of a very long 3dmm movie in a very high resolution to fight against compression. the "1080p" would also draw more people to my mirror of the movie

OH MY GOD I'M BREAKING SO MANY LAWS.

06-30-2012, 11:40 PM	#26277
Nixon Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 4,302	edit pic link didnt work
Nixon Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 4,302

06-30-2012, 11:41 PM	#26278
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133	it does?
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133

07-01-2012, 01:22 AM	#26281
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133	tired and i want to sleep hmmm i'm snoozing already
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133

07-01-2012, 07:15 AM	#26283
Jt Copper Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 3,463	Phil, Its ghost in the shell, by Red "Fucking" Wampa. It deserves to be 1080p.
Jt Copper Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 3,463

07-01-2012, 07:23 AM	#26284
Evil Ash Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 15,534	It can't even be 1080p. You're just upscaling from something stupid like 540x310. You're just making it big and blurry.
Evil Ash Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 15,534

06-30-2012, 11:39 PM	#26276
Old Rivers Super Moderator Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 6,998	god dammit, eukos

06-30-2012, 11:42 PM	#26279
Old Rivers Super Moderator Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 6,998	i think he's talking about his own post

07-01-2012, 12:23 AM	#26280
Dominator Dan Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 11,564	bill nickson never talks about himself, he is the most selfless person you'd ever meet, truly an inspiration to us all in the everlasting journey to better ourselves

07-01-2012, 06:53 AM	#26282
Phil Williamson Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 16,900	haha why would you release a 3dmm movie in 1080p

07-01-2012, 07:40 AM	#26285
Phil Williamson Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 16,900	yeah. any resolution increase above 3dmm's native resolution can't possibly do anything.

07-01-2012, 07:52 AM	#26286
Slime Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 24,891	well ive found that on youtube, uploading my footage (which is 1680x1050) at a higher resolution (1920x1200) enables 1080p which ends up looking better than 720p what i mean is that the video will look better in 720p than it will in 480p wont it? the thing is you are trying to counter youtube's compression and the original video codec compression, which introduce artifacts if you were to just match 3dmm's resolution... its not the same as boosting the res on your monitor to try to make 3dmm look better or something also i dont think 1440x1080 enables 1080p, does it? i thought that just enables 720p the best thing about 1920x1200 is that it enables the Original option, which gets rid of all crappy youtube compression: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ffDJMJkAoI even 1080p has visible annoyances to me (especially in dark areas, they lack detail) compared to Original edit: wait... can everyone see the Original option, or just me? cause ive never seen anyone else's video with an Original option
Slime Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 24,891

07-01-2012, 08:10 AM	#26288
Slime Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 24,891	upscaling is always worth it to fight compression. I WANT SOME OF WHATEVER ASH AND PHIL ARE SMOKING!! also could you check my vid and tell me if you see an "original" quality option please
Slime Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 24,891

07-01-2012, 08:13 AM	#26289
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133	another thing is that if I put the effort into recording an hour long movie I want everything to be as good as possible. there were a few things in the Ghost In The Shell 3dmm I fixed up such as spelling errors etc. (for example "WIRTTEN BY" in the opening sequence) We live in the year 2012, and when working with making it "1080p" I make sure that the quality is the best as it can get for a 3dmm movie
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133

07-01-2012, 08:23 AM	#26291
Slime Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 24,891	cool thats kinda strange though since 1920x1200 isnt that high of a resolution, but i never see videos with the Original quality
Slime Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 24,891

07-01-2012, 08:26 AM	#26292
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133	probably because everyone thinks that 1080p is the maximum you can get on youtube, so they don't bother rendering something in a higher resolution
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133

07-01-2012, 08:29 AM	#26293
Slime Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 24,891	maybe it can go even BEYOND ORIGINAL haha that vid even has 3D because of the resolution
Slime Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 24,891

07-01-2012, 08:33 AM	#26294
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133	the 3D option totally messes up my videos LOL, the colours and all
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133

07-01-2012, 08:37 AM	#26295
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133	also what I forgot to mention is that this whole "watch 3dmm movies in 1080p" is sort of a "marketing" thing. I'm probably the first one to actually do this and if people see movies on YouTube being called "HD 1080p" and all, they get noticed more likely. even here there are probably lots of people who haven't seen the ghost in the shell 3dm and posting a YouTube mirror of a movie is always appreciated anyway
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133

07-01-2012, 10:27 AM	#26296
James McCloud Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 4,214	as 3dmm.com image coordinator i'm going to have to ask you to stop your 'marketing'

07-01-2012, 11:51 AM	#26297
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133	hahaha okay
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133

07-01-2012, 01:08 PM	#26298
Bown Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 18,746	that wouldn't really work at all
Bown Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 18,746

07-01-2012, 01:26 PM	#26299
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133	hmm?
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133

07-01-2012, 01:30 PM	#26300
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133	I don't get what's so wrong about this, I do a mirror of a very long 3dmm movie in a very high resolution to fight against compression. the "1080p" would also draw more people to my mirror of the movie OH MY GOD I'M BREAKING SO MANY LAWS.
Eukos Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 3,133

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode