3dmm.com

3dmm Chatroom: Daily meetings at 11pm GMT (6pm EST)
Go Back   3dmm.com > 3D Movie Maker > 3DMM Releases
User Name
Password
Register Site Rules FAQ Members List

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 02-04-2008, 05:27 AM
The Masters
Andres's Avatar
Go to movie
2003, Movie, Action, Directed by Konrad Chan
A bunch of fighting masters engage in numerous fights and car chases.

Jeff Ching hailed this movie as one of the most entertaining films in the festival, as well as some other people. All I'm wondering, of course, is what movie you guys saw. Because the one I saw is a piece of shit, a really, really annoying piece of shit.

The Masters is an old-school action movie. Instead of making his own scenes, Konrad keeps it simple, using default scenes throughout most of the movie. The rest of the time, he just adds a hilariously horrible loop of a car with colored cubes on the background. Since the scenes are the default scenes, instead of Konrad actually doing the scenes, the movie has no style whatsoever. It's a complete void directing-wise. Zero. Nada. There is no visual characteristic to be found here.

The movie is about a bunch of nameless retards hitting each other for an eternal amount of time. Yup, that's it. And then it ends with a punchline. The punchline alone should make me take off one whole point from this movie, because I've fucking had it with the idiotic punchlines this FF has had so far, and this one is just the last one I'm going to fucking take. Was I supposed to laugh at this? Was this supposed to be funny? What was the director thinking? "Yeah, they'll all laugh after all the excitement has gone by"?

Jeff Ching mentioned how we should admire the creativity of this movie. I have a better idea, Jeff. Admire my foot in your fucking jaw, because I would have ignored this gargantuan piece of shit if it weren't for positive reviews from guys like you. There is NOTHING to be admired from this movie. NOTHING. I mean, where's the creativity that I should be admiring? Is it in the fact that the movie makes action scenes exactly the way the program was intended to be used, with the scenes and angles it brings, like a good boy who's watched those McZee movies too much? Let's throw a damn party, why don't we? That the movie emulates the directing form of the past, with shitty MIDIs to boot? That it's minimalist, so fucking minimalist that there's not even competent music? Open the fucking champagne! Or that, like almost every other fucking movie in this film festival, it has absolutely no story whatsoever?

What exactly does this movie achieve? In the long run, what can be influential about this movie? What, the use of default scenes again? How fucking progressive of us. If this were well executed, it'd be a mere curiosity, a "look what can be done... whoo... let's move on" triviality, like Johnny Samsinite. But it's not executed well. It's boring. It has no emotion whatsoever. The music sucks shit. There's no direction. There's no acting. There's no story. There's NOTHING. NOTHING. Could someone explain to me the creativity of not even trying to do something new with the program, instead relying on a style that's 7 years old?!? And if you're going to tell me this was a homage to old movies, then shove it. Because it sucked at making me feel nostalgic. If anything, this movie makes me hate old movies. Which I used to love. So even lesser points. God, I hate this movie.

0/5. You want to be creative? Tell a story.
1%
1%
Terrible
“You want to be creative? Tell a story.”
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Sig Police

Contact Us | RSS Feed | Top

Powered By ezboard Ver. 5.2
Copyright ©1999-2000 ezboard, Inc.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.