Hybrid machinima showcase: Doomguy shoots imp with shotgun

It seems that nobody got the hybrid 3DMM/Machinima concept. But, I am showcasing it with this movie:

[Denny Betterman]

blblbl you ding dong, just because people disagree with a bad idea because it's a bad idea doesn't mean they don't GET it. And has anyone else noticed that this person never listens to anyone and always just argues back without thinking about anything

the stupidest part is that every clueless thing he says sprawls out into multi-page threads despite the fact that clinton's brain is incapable of learning from others or rational thought

we really need something better to do on this bored

[Mabdog]

ok, what the hell is machinema? seriously

[Bown]

Originally Posted by Denny Betterman

the stupidest part is that every clueless thing he says sprawls out into multi-page threads despite the fact that clinton's brain is incapable of learning from others or rational thought

That's the aspergers I guess

[Kale Monster]

THATS ENOUGH ABOUT THE BRIDGE!

[Phil Williamson]

I...guess this might be useful occasionally, but it's not like it's gonna REVOLUTIONIZE THE PROGRAM and needs to be proclaimed as the salvation of 3dmm

[Cubert]

Yeah, this kind of innovention isn't completely useless, but far from demands it's own "showcase movie".

[bl0ppin]

Man alive, the transition between Doom and 3dmm was seamless!!!1

In all fairness though, if you want to do this kind of thing, go ahead and do it, but, PLEASE stop trying to pressure people into seeing it as some important, radical new method.

[Air Rick]

hahahah wtf

[Mabdog]

to tell you the truth, I don't hate this. It looks fine to me.. the others are just bitching because they already hate you. I think this is a fine idea, but you could pretty much do the exact same thing in only 3dmm.

[Air Rick]

not necessarily true.

Do I think the idea is good in concept? Sure

Do I think that this particular piece executes said concept well? No. The transition is painfully obvious, the frame rate even more so. Perhaps if the film didn't revolve around a guy shooting, but instead some sort of dialogue where the cutaway/closeup would be necessary, then this would have worked.

Understandable that you can utilize 3dmm to get those shots that you would never get in certain programs, but this doesn't scream "showcase." It's pretty basic.

[Samurai Clinton]

Originally Posted by Mabdog

to tell you the truth, I don't hate this. It looks fine to me.. the others are just bitching because they already hate you. I think this is a fine idea, but you could pretty much do the exact same thing in only 3dmm.

Dude, if you recognize the fact that those jackasses hate me, just back me up on this bullshit since it might prove that somebody is "on my side"!

[Samurai Clinton]

Originally Posted by Eric Ryan

not necessarily true.

Do I think the idea is good in concept? Sure

Do I think that this particular piece executes said concept well? No. The transition is painfully obvious, the frame rate even more so. Perhaps if the film didn't revolve around a guy shooting, but instead some sort of dialogue where the cutaway/closeup would be necessary, then this would have worked.

Understandable that you can utilize 3dmm to get those shots that you would never get in certain programs, but this doesn't scream "showcase." It's pretty basic.

Well, if I am going to showcase "innovative" ways to splice film to different movie making programs, simplicity is sufficient enough. I don't think this is too trivial of a short as it showcases a rarely used way to finalize a project.

[bl0ppin]

hahaha do you really want Mabdog on your side? Also, goddamn, can't you edit things into 1 post?

[Air Rick]

Originally Posted by Samurai Clinton

simplicity is sufficient enough.

Does what Clinton said right there actually make sense structurally...or am I just over-analyzing the text to the point where, it just looks like it doesn't?

[bl0ppin]

I think what he's saying is, as long as he is showing his new method of moviemaking, it doesn't need to be amazing or complex.

[Air Rick]

no no no, i understood what he meant, but just the sentence:

"simplicity is sufficient enough."

I don't know, the way it's written...it looked weird to me...nevermind.

[Phil Williamson]

it's redundant, and wrong in the sense that he should have said "a simple example," not "simplicity." but who cares.

[Slime]

This example is dumb... why is there a random green background, as someone said in the Youtube comments?

[Raz]

clinton, the only reason people aren't interested in your ideas is because you're the only one any of them appeals to. it's nice you're trying to be productive and stuff but why don't you go and make a movie incorporating all these things instead of making a bunch of threads saying "HEY LOOK GUYS WE SHOULD DO THIS".

[Samurai Clinton]

Originally Posted by Gilzenan

clinton, the only reason people aren't interested in your ideas is because you're the only one any of them appeals to. it's nice you're trying to be productive and stuff but why don't you go and make a movie incorporating all these things instead of making a bunch of threads saying "HEY LOOK GUYS WE SHOULD DO THIS".

Well, people have been flaming me in these suggestion threads, so I though having a short showcase of something I had in my imagination would prove why its so cool to have unique concepts in 3dmm.

[Raz]

but man...that hasn't proved anything.

[Cubert]

Originally Posted by Samurai Clinton

Well, people have been flaming me in these suggestion threads, so I though having a short showcase of something I had in my imagination would prove why its so cool to have unique concepts in 3dmm.

Extend these ideas to a full movie and people would maybe listen a bit more.

[Air Rick]

okay, summary Clinton. So take this, embed it. Write it, put it on your wall above your bed, study it daily:

STOP TALKING, START MAKING

[Slime]

Stop talking, start making Mah Bruddah n Me 2.