The stupid kids are back in an even longer and funnier adventure

Da-t · 11:59 AM

I'd say this is one of the best 3d movies out there. There were so many funny parts in it. Exspecially the Mentos.

I'd say my favorite part was...dare I say it? The Mentos. There were some other good parts too. Like the montage and the Pecachus(sp?). I also got most of the spoofs like the the secerity guard fight scene from the Matrix, the field scene from the Lost World. Not only spoofing games. There are alot of games in there that I do know. Like Metal Gear Solid, Pokemon, Final Fantasy, etc.

It was pretty overlonged, not like the first one. The first one was like, 6 minutes long. Go figure! It's also the longest 3dmm movie I've ever seen. But the longer it is, the funnier it gets. Like when Mikey made himself "Godlike" that was hilarious. The only thing they reused in this movie from the first one was the two kids, the Videogame Master, and Goomba.

It was really good, 100%. Longer than my first review wasn't it?

Bown · 05-31-2007, 07:10 AM

Still far too short, to be honest. Take a look at reviews by people like Aaron Haynes, Jon Barton, Andres, etc. to see how long a review should really have to be to deserve its own review thread and not just a reply in the movie's thread.

Blooman · 03:33 PM

And all 2 of your reviews give the movies 100.

Blooman · 06-16-2007, 03:35 PM

Take a look at my review for Flight 93: Where are you?. It's much, much longer than your review. Maybe it will inspire you to make one as long as this or longer.

Demented Ferret · 06-16-2007, 03:44 PM

Haha, stop reviewing the review! Also why on Earth would you bump an old review thread just to criticize it?

06-16-2007, 04:10 PM

Reviewing movies is tricky business. You have to get the details just right, and be unbiased as well. You can't just hand out 100%s, either. The movies have to earn them (not saying this movie wasn't great -- it was quite hilarious). I know I probably couldn't string a good review together. I think this sort of thing is best left up to people like Aaron Haynes and Andres.

James McCloud · 06-16-2007, 11:41 PM

That's why the database exists. For everyone to give submissions, but people are quite right. There needs to be more substance and cohesion than just: "Yeah [Movie] was [Good/Bad]. My [least/..] favourite part was [Part], I give it [Score] out of [Max Score]".

06-17-2007, 02:39 AM

That's what I mean. If you can give a good review like Aaron Haynes, then go for it. If it's going to be "Yeah [Movie] was [Good/Bad]. My [least/..] favourite part was [Part], I give it [Score] out of [Max Score]," then you had better leave it up to more seasoned reviewers. Then again, if you don't practice, you'll never get better, so I don't know. It seemed like someone said, "whether we like it or not, they [newbies] are the community's future."

Blooman · 06-17-2007, 08:43 AM

This is a new review thread for an old movie thread. Do you get it?

Marko Polo · 06-17-2007, 05:14 PM

Yes I think we all get how retarded you are, preston

Cubert · 06-17-2007, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Preston

This is a new review thread for an old movie thread. Do you get it?

No please explain.

05-31-2007, 07:10 AM	#2
Bown Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 18,740	Still far too short, to be honest. Take a look at reviews by people like Aaron Haynes, Jon Barton, Andres, etc. to see how long a review should really have to be to deserve its own review thread and not just a reply in the movie's thread.
Bown Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 18,740

06-16-2007, 03:33 PM	#3
Blooman Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 413	And all 2 of your reviews give the movies 100.
Blooman Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 413	Last edited by Blooman : 06-16-2007 at 03:33 PM. Reason: I forgot to type "of" in the sentence.

06-16-2007, 03:35 PM	#4
Blooman Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 413	Take a look at my review for Flight 93: Where are you?. It's much, much longer than your review. Maybe it will inspire you to make one as long as this or longer.
Blooman Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 413

06-16-2007, 04:10 PM	#6
Manny Cav Posts: n/a	Reviewing movies is tricky business. You have to get the details just right, and be unbiased as well. You can't just hand out 100%s, either. The movies have to earn them (not saying this movie wasn't great -- it was quite hilarious). I know I probably couldn't string a good review together. I think this sort of thing is best left up to people like Aaron Haynes and Andres.
Manny Cav Posts: n/a

06-17-2007, 02:39 AM	#8
Manny Cav Posts: n/a	That's what I mean. If you can give a good review like Aaron Haynes, then go for it. If it's going to be "Yeah [Movie] was [Good/Bad]. My [least/..] favourite part was [Part], I give it [Score] out of [Max Score]," then you had better leave it up to more seasoned reviewers. Then again, if you don't practice, you'll never get better, so I don't know. It seemed like someone said, "whether we like it or not, they [newbies] are the community's future."
Manny Cav Posts: n/a

06-16-2007, 03:44 PM	#5
Demented Ferret Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 16,248	Haha, stop reviewing the review! Also why on Earth would you bump an old review thread just to criticize it?

06-16-2007, 11:41 PM	#7
James McCloud Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 4,214	That's why the database exists. For everyone to give submissions, but people are quite right. There needs to be more substance and cohesion than just: "Yeah [Movie] was [Good/Bad]. My [least/..] favourite part was [Part], I give it [Score] out of [Max Score]".

06-17-2007, 08:43 AM	#9
Blooman Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 413	This is a new review thread for an old movie thread. Do you get it?
Blooman Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 413

06-17-2007, 05:14 PM	#10
Marko Polo Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 721	Yes I think we all get how retarded you are, preston
Marko Polo Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 721