Bombing of Hiroshima

[Plopilpy]

There are good ways to do that, and making it purposefully bad isn't one of them. This movie is not good, and as has been said in other threads and on other low-effort movies, the point of 3dmm.com is to watch movies that are interesting and which are innovative. A purposefully bad, trying-to-be-90s movie doesn't fit any of those categories. I have no idea about why you think 3D text isn't fitting with the style of your movie. For example, all of the movies that PizzaLuigi posted (and most other well-recieved movies from 2000-2003) use 3D text, and that is what most members think of when they hear "90s movies". Hell, even some (albeit very few) movies released just 2 or 3 years after 3dmm's release used 3D text and revolutionized the program because people wanted to see interesting things like those movies, not the typical movie that 3DMM was intended for. Jimmy Pozin, one of the all-time most famous 3DMM directors ever, made Litterbug 2 and other very very VERY impressive movies, and he only began using expansions late into the 2000s. He never used v3DMM, not once. Just check out World War III, a movie that was made before 3DMM was even 5 years old. It's not stellar, but it's still a badass movie that uses 3D text and was liked because it portrays an interesting way of making weapons by doing that! Action Joe 2 is one of the oldest movies ever (made 1997!) to have handmade scenery, and you know why people liked Action Joe 2? Because it popularized this style of making movies with scenery that wasn't inside 3DMM's vocabulary, so to speak, but rather movies that push that boundary and break through to make something actually interesting to watch. That is the purpose of 3dmm.com, not what you're thinking of.